Don Smith

I'm talking about vitamin D, not myself.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...503119_pf.html

Shantilly

One bold step for mankind, one small step for artificial u.v exposure!!

eileen

Vitamin Don

Nice article.

__________________
under-exposure to uv rays is as dangerous as over-exposure...This is "D" life! (eileen)

kdhtan

another great article I will be printing and making employees read. Plus keeping it on hand to hand out to clients!!!


Thanks

CrystalSS

Totally "D"ivine!!! Great share!

mr belvedere

Allright there, Eileen in high-heels - hehe. Post the article and give us your take on it, por favor. ~sheesh~

*New Rule- If you post a link from an article in the world, you must give your opinion, and post the article!*

~See what you started, Jim?! hehe~

__________________
"A dusty bible leads to a dirty life ..." -Synonymous

eileen

Belvy I always respect copyright issues first. If it's an article I really like it willl take me a few days to post because I email the writer for permission first. You can usually tell at the bottom of the article how serious they are about sharing their articles. Many want you to share their article to get "more" exposure. I am just as careful with photographs when I include them. I'm coorsponding with one now that would like to let me use her drawing but she's held back by the company she works for, which I fully understand. On this particular article Don is wise to only post a link. Not sure you would want to full around with the Washington Post's copyright issues.

As for my take on this article, I think it's a very good read but unfortunately it's from company's that will profit from selling supplements point of view. At least they are honest in mentioning this method could be toxic (of course that means visits to the Dr. to make sure!) Taking out the last sentence would make me happier. lol

__________________
under-exposure to uv rays is as dangerous as over-exposure...This is "D" life! (eileen)

excusemesir

IMHO we're getting way to excited over any positive article on Vitamin D. Again IMHO, this article sucks. Read the last paragraph...it may be pro Vit D but it's anti-tanning. I wouldn't show it to my customers must less my employees. If an article/video/news story (or fairy tale for that matter) doesn't give the direct connection between UV exposure in general and indoor tanning specifically it's basically useless. Again I'll add...IMHO.

Don Smith

Excuse me, (sir) but don't hold your breath waiting for the "perfect" article.

eileen

I totally disagree excuseme. My reason is many people care more about organic and getting away from things that are processed. I know this why else would Walmart start selling more organic products every day. Anyway I think most people prefer to get what they can from natural sources before spending money on something that is processed or a pill.

__________________
under-exposure to uv rays is as dangerous as over-exposure...This is "D" life! (eileen)