Soakinuptherays

Quote:The problem with diversion, is that a lot of salons complain about diversion but then support products that are being diverted all over the internet.


I agree that this is completely right.

If salon owners would use their ability to make any product their top seller and would choose products that are not diverted.

That would force manufacturers to actually do something to stop diversion.

Tanzenite

Quote:
On 2005-11-14 19:52:00, tangenie wrote:
I personally don't think 2 companies on the internet with what I know now is a bad track record. And I am doing things about it. When you say 1 month in business and 2 companies selling our product on the internet, not a very good track record, what companies track record are you comparing me to.


I am not comparing you to any company, I am just going by what you say. You posted that salons are supporting diversion by purchasing lotions that are all over the intenet. So, you are contradicting yourself because your lotions are also available over the internet. Whether it be 1 or 100 sites selling lotions, yours is available on at least 2. And for only being in business for a month (congrats by the way), I would say that that is not the best track record.

So to post here saying don't support diversion, your are also saying, don't buy Tangenie products.

caribbean tan man

leave it to TANGENIE to bring a 1 year old topic back up just to promote himself!
BUY A BANNER!

Soakinuptherays

As a lotion manufacturer, I understand the issues with stopping diversion.

Despite my best efforts, tanning salon owners sold my products on e-bay. All I could do was identify them and then cut them off. That is what I did.

One diversion website had have extremely old products listed on it's site. Those products where sold before diversion was ever an issue when I actually sold to distributors about a billion years ago.

Thanks for bring back this post.... It was great advise then as it is now. I enjoyed the rerun!!!