Go Back   tanTALK - Tanning Salon Business Owners Community > TanTalk Central > Tanning Equipment

Tanning Equipment From Low pressure to High pressure tanning equipment.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-15-2002, 07:32 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2 2002
Location: 2621 W Main Suite 9
Posts: 616
Rep Power: 12 bsmart will become famous soon enough
I'm curious if anyone has upgraded their beds from standard 100W lamps, to 100W reflector lamps, and if so, what change did you see in total UV readings on a 5.0 Solarmeter.

I think there would be a increase in UV output, as measured by the meter, but I have no idea how much to expect. I also think there would be an increase in the intensity of the session for the client. But, I wonder if a 20 minute session would become unbearable or uncomfortable for them? Anyone else done this yet? Hope to hear from you, and learn from your experiences!! Thanks.
bsmart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2002, 08:36 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 29 2001
Location: Davenport, IA
Age: 49
Posts: 2,432
Rep Power: 14 Teresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud of
I am not 100% sure but I do not think that I can change my 100W lamps to 100W reflector lamps and still maintain my lamp compatibility with manufacturers reccommended.
Teresa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2002, 09:31 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 13 2001
Location: MI
Posts: 861
Rep Power: 12 solarmeter has a spectacular aura aboutsolarmeter has a spectacular aura about
In general, reflector lamps belong in beds designed to use them, where the spacing between lamps is very tight (about the width of a nickel). This is because the irradiance is directed out the front half of the lamp, and wide spacing is not needed for back side UV to be bounced off metal reflectors behind the lamps.

I do not know if any R lamps are listed compatible with non-R lamps. If so, the erythemal output on a model 7.0 meter should be within 10% of the original.

Also, in general, output from R lamps is higher. You'd need to be careful of striping due to the wide spacing (about a half inch) between lamps, since there isn't any UV shining out between the lamps.

Having said all that, there might be folks who think they've had success substituting R for non-R in certain kinds of beds/booths. If so, they can add to this thread.

solarmeter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2002, 09:47 AM   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2 2000
Location: GA & TN
Posts: 196
Rep Power: 0 Sam James is an unknown quantity at this point
Teresa, you would be correct with your statement on lamp compatibility. A reflector lamp would have a shorter exposure time than a non reflector lamp. Also keep in mind that reflector lamps are not a good choice for beds that have very much distance between the lamps. They were designed to be very close to each other so as to avoid uneven tans, especially in the lounge where the tanner is usually very close to the lamps.

A good example would be the Black Sun Infinity 65 compared to the Black Sun Reflex Series 2. These two lamps are the same exact lamp with one exception. The Black Sun Reflex Series 2 has a built in reflector. While the Infinity lamp is compatibile to many lamps, the Reflex is not.

Bsmart, As far as the output readings, in general the reflector lamps would read higher. If you made such a change, there would be a significant differnece in the way the bed tans.
Sam James is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2002, 09:53 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 13 2002
Location: N CAL
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11 summrtan is on a distinguished road
If I'm not mistaken installing reflector lamps in beds that has the bulbs spaced to far apart will result in stripes..right?
summrtan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2002, 09:53 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 29 2001
Location: Davenport, IA
Age: 49
Posts: 2,432
Rep Power: 14 Teresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud ofTeresa has much to be proud of
Thought so....and that the first thing my health inspectors check is that every single lamp is in spec.
They will shut a piece of equiptment or a whole salon down for non-compatable lamps, where they'll give you a 30 day notice to fix any other violations.

_________________


[ This Message was edited by: Teresa on 2002-09-15 09:54 ][ This Message was edited by: Teresa on 2002-09-15 09:56 ]
Teresa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2002, 12:33 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2 2002
Location: 2621 W Main Suite 9
Posts: 616
Rep Power: 12 bsmart will become famous soon enough
I definitely would NOT suggest that salons in REGULATED states try this approach. I DO think it would be a good experiment for some of the R&D folks in the crowd. We are always trying new things to improve the tanning experience. Any more thoughts on this topic?? I'd like to hear from more of the lamp suppiers on their thoughts along this line. I think the lamps could be some distance apart without getting the striping effect. That would depend on the width in the opening in the aperture of course. I believe each lamp maker uses a different aperture opening, measured in degrees.

_________________
[ This Message was edited by: bsmart on 2002-09-16 12:36 ]
bsmart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2002, 08:33 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 27 2001
Posts: 204
Rep Power: 12 lampman is on a distinguished road
We have had customers replace some of their lamps with reflector lamps.We do not recommend it in the base of the beds but have had good results in the top.There are some reflector lamps with compatability to non reflectors but not many.
lampman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2002, 12:36 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2 2002
Location: 2621 W Main Suite 9
Posts: 616
Rep Power: 12 bsmart will become famous soon enough
Lampman, those were my thoughts exactly. I was thinking of putting reflectors in the canopy and standard lamps in the bench. In your opinion, how close together would the lamps in the bench need to be to avoid striping, if I'm using a reflector lamp where standard lamps were used originally? If the aperture opening was near 165 to 180 degrees there shouldn't be a problem, right???
bsmart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2002, 04:42 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 27 2001
Posts: 204
Rep Power: 12 lampman is on a distinguished road
The lamps should be almost touching each other.The lamps have reflectors from 180 to 200 degrees.If you have distance between the acrylic and the lamps the lamps have less of a chance to stripe.
lampman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phillips sundayz General Tanning Industry Discussions 2 02-07-2005 06:23 PM
Diffrerences in 100W bi-pin bulbs vincentc77 Tanning Equipment 1 02-03-2005 10:41 AM
30 bulbs...reflector or non? uptowntans Tanning Equipment 3 02-10-2004 03:41 PM
reflector lamps vs. non reflector galej Tanning Equipment 8 05-04-2003 11:47 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2009 - tanTALK.com



click here for advertising info!