|
|
#13 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jan 30 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 356
Rep Power: 3
![]() ![]() |
Re: Mystic Tan Solution vs California Tan
First there are plenty of other solutions you can use besides those two. I don't think your average client knows Mystic makes a solution. I agree, most people put the name Mystic to the actual booth itself.Surprised you didn't like Magic Tan booth. In my conversations and research most preferred it over Mystic. Just a personal thing I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
I vote for DERF!
![]() Join Date: Jan 6 2004
Location: Midwest-ish
Posts: 2,013
Rep Power: 5
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Mystic Tan Solution vs California Tan
"Also, I went spray tanning at a competitors salon and they use Mystic Tan solution. I did not like how I turned out. The color was way tooo light and it smelled bad. So, with the better solution I was going to "one up" that place."
How do you know they used Mystic solution also? Unless you ask every salon, and most employees either will not know or just assume or just say "yes", you have no way of knowing what they are really using in the booth. Go with whats best for you, but there are many solutions out there and whenever you think you found the best something else comes along.
__________________
Quote by mkubal on prinitng: "I think that when the print dialogue says "(borderless)" what it really means to say is "(this would be borderless were it not for the giant white border)."" |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mystic Tan Suing California Tan | tanMBA | Sunless | 60 | 07-23-2005 08:12 AM |
| Somebody outta be SPANKED | Sheila in Minnesota | Open Forum | 75 | 06-26-2005 08:10 AM |
| Mystic Tan spray booth solution v Cal Tan solution | barringt0n | Open Forum | 1 | 11-17-2004 06:54 AM |
| Mystic vs California Tan Solution... | Kimberleigh | Tanning Biz Newbies | 1 | 09-07-2004 10:19 AM |