|
|
04-26-2001, 10:40 AM
|
#1 (permalink) |
 Join Date: Jan 29 2001
Posts: 238
Rep Power: 8
 |
I saw on another board that QDM and Puretan are going to "get it on" in some sort of comparison showdown, but it seems they are trying to come to an agreement on how to judge. Should we judge Tanning equipment by the science or the customers percepition on how the bed works??I post this as a fairly loyal Puretan User and intersted spectator since i need a 3 Elipse or equivilent.
|
|
|
|
04-26-2001, 06:21 PM
|
#2 (permalink) |
 Join Date: Apr 21 2001
Posts: 485
Rep Power: 8
|
I believe performance and actual meter readings are most important, however there are other factors that need to be looked at.1. Session times, getting a good result in the least amount of time means increased revenue for us the salon owner2. Appearance and bells and whistles, results may keep people coming back but the initial wow effect is what gets em to shell out the big bucks.3. Comfort level, some people like and expect to get hot but a majority I feel want to have a cooler tanning session while still seeing results 4. The final thing that should affect a decision i believe is sales and service as well as durability and availability of replacement parts and tech supportAnyone else have any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2003 Puretan Ellipse IV (SOLD) | lil_missfit | For Sale | 10 | 10-18-2006 08:32 PM |
| Puretan Available | Dustin | For Sale | 17 | 12-08-2005 05:44 PM |
| Puretan under new ownership | Hank van | Open Forum | 0 | 02-22-2005 11:57 AM |
| I wanted to run Puretan bulbs but....... | House of Tan | Equipment | 3 | 10-22-2003 10:09 AM |
