|
General Tanning Industry Discussions Tanning Salon Owners and Professionals in The Tanning Industry Discuss a wide Variety of Topics. |
View Poll Results: Is a BAN in order here? Choose carefully. Read the whole thread before voting. | |||
Ban Lester Szurko from Tantalk | 23 | 37.10% | |
Ban the words Fantasy Tan from Tantalk | 18 | 29.03% | |
Keep the Fantasy word and let Salon Owners post their good/bad experiences. | 28 | 45.16% | |
Do Nothing | 10 | 16.13% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools |
09-23-2009, 10:55 AM | #91 (permalink) |
Guest Join Date: Apr 29 2001 Location: Stewartsville, NJ Age: 55
Posts: 3,121
Rep Power: 0 | Re: Fantasy Tan Bashes UV Tanning Obviously #3 is the only correct choice. Words should not be banned. It is counter productive, it keeps the info from being searched and just sweeps it under the rug. Lester should not be banned as he has not broken any of the rules on this site and I was the one that called him out on it with an e-mail and he just found his way here to defend his opinion/position. Doing nothing is what this industry does best, hence® the position we are in right now with the media and the public. The only correct thing to do is to leave all words in play, leave Lester in play, and vote with our checkbooks. The info and additional info added to this topic will be able to be searched for future inquiries so people can make an educated decision on who they do business with. Lester should be allowed to stay. Just because we don't agree with his business practices he should not be shunted from the conversation. It is better to keep him close and have him participate so we are better informed as to the angles that these companies tend to operate toward. He came on and answered professionally about his position and that does not warrant banning. Eileen, take your emotions out of it. It is apparent who added the poll to this thread. Work with just the facts. Everyone should post their humble opinions on this topic and it will be archived for future reference. If you disagree with the way Fantasy Tan does business or have a problem with their advertising then you can simply do one of two things: 1) You can ask the company to change their position in the industry and explain how this hurts all involved. or 2) You can vote with your checkbooks and discontinue purchasing any other products from this company as you feel that they are doing you a disservice in the industry. The choice is yours, do the right thing. Last edited by Brian Oshman; 09-23-2009 at 11:25 AM. |
09-23-2009, 11:29 AM | #92 (permalink) | |
Join Date: Feb 10 2005
Posts: 8,304
Rep Power: 35 | Re: Fantasy Tan Bashes UV Tanning Quote:
__________________ "under exposure to UV rays is as dangerous as overexposure....this is D life" eileen | |
09-23-2009, 11:32 AM | #93 (permalink) | |
Guest Join Date: Apr 29 2001 Location: Stewartsville, NJ Age: 55
Posts: 3,121
Rep Power: 0 | Re: Fantasy Tan Bashes UV Tanning Quote:
Follow the writen words now. I understand why you want words banned. It is easier to dispose of things you don't comprehend. | |
09-23-2009, 11:47 AM | #94 (permalink) | |||
Guest Join Date: Apr 29 2001 Location: Stewartsville, NJ Age: 55
Posts: 3,121
Rep Power: 0 | Re: Fantasy Tan Bashes UV Tanning www.infinitisun.com From the testimonial section on this website: Quote:
Quote:
^^^That's a problem. Quote:
^^^That's a problem. These are excerpts form testimonials posted on the website. More blatant UV bashing. They have the control on what they post on their site and they allow this to occur. It is controllable. You have been brainwashed. This is today and it is still going on. | |||
09-23-2009, 12:28 PM | #95 (permalink) |
Join Date: May 20 2003
Posts: 9,301
Rep Power: 29 | Re: Fantasy Tan Bashes UV Tanning I'd post just the opposite on my site but I wouldn't stoop to that level. When people come in and tell me how they were hacking from the thing blasting them in the face, lack of instructions from the imbecilic staff, the streaks and spotty coverage especially around the joints and ankles and how you have to basically be a do nothing for a living or you'll ruin the application, I laugh and sell them tantowels. See, that's a true downside to something. Nothing about imaginary risks or ailments. Just sucky product. I don't drink Diet Coke. Not because it has fake sugar that might cause cancer but BECAUSE IT SUCKS! That's all folks. You get around the "danger" not by drinking the calorie free poison version of something you just drink less of the regular. |
09-23-2009, 12:39 PM | #96 (permalink) | |
I love Derf!! Join Date: Aug 17 2007 Location: Ohio Age: 48
Posts: 1,360
Rep Power: 17 | Re: Fantasy Tan Bashes UV Tanning Quote:
Brian hit the nail on the head with the posts above..take time to read it..slowly | |
09-23-2009, 01:07 PM | #98 (permalink) | |
Join Date: Feb 10 2005
Posts: 8,304
Rep Power: 35 | Re: Fantasy Tan Bashes UV Tanning Quote:
__________________ "under exposure to UV rays is as dangerous as overexposure....this is D life" eileen | |
09-23-2009, 01:08 PM | #99 (permalink) | |
Join Date: Feb 10 2005
Posts: 8,304
Rep Power: 35 | Re: Fantasy Tan Bashes UV Tanning Quote:
I have no time for you either. If you can't comprehend a simple question I have to move on to other things.
__________________ "under exposure to UV rays is as dangerous as overexposure....this is D life" eileen | |
Bookmarks |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GLAMOUR Magazine bashes indoor tanning | caribbean tan man | Say What ????? | 5 | 09-12-2009 11:17 AM |
Melanocrap Youtube Bashes Tanning Salons | eileen | General Tanning Industry Discussions | 17 | 07-11-2007 06:55 PM |
BAD NEWS!! NBC BASHES TANNING | rowekyle | General Tanning Industry Discussions | 24 | 04-26-2006 03:34 PM |
Fantasy Tanning Company | gilneedscolor | General Tanning Industry Discussions | 3 | 04-24-2004 04:03 AM |
Indoor Tanning Fantasy Football League | Bronze Star | Say What ????? | 2 | 01-14-2002 07:12 PM |