 |
02-14-2005, 02:20 PM
| #1 (permalink) |
 Join Date: Jan 28 2004
Posts: 256
Rep Power: 21  | Just had someone call and and ask if their daughters account could be put on hold because she has been reading in all these magazines that tanning is bad for you and has decided she doesn't want to tan. Why do they always publish the bad things and not the good effects of tanning? This is so aggravating. And then if you tell them that it's not all that bad, they either believe you or the Dr.s errr... |
|  |
|
02-14-2005, 02:34 PM
| #3 (permalink) |
 Join Date: Feb 12 2005 Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 0 | Haven't you looked around? I think people ENJOY being afraid of things. Because of this, a story about something that's BAD for you will sell better! Who wants to read a story about something that's actually GOOD for you? I think it's sensationalism at work here... Could that be why www.EatYourBrusselSprouts.com failed? |
|
| |
 |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is Tanning Replacing Phototherapy? | tangirl | General Tanning Industry Discussions | 5 | 10-21-2009 09:23 AM |
| In an unregulated State? | Neon Beach | Tanning Salon Management | 11 | 06-06-2007 02:57 PM |
| Is Natural Sunlight The Same As Indoor Tanning? | MATT A | General Tanning Industry Discussions | 4 | 06-29-2005 01:04 AM |
| First came the Dunce of the Month award. | BooBop | Tanning Salon Management | 4 | 02-11-2003 09:28 PM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 AM.
