UV + DHA. Is it a no no? - tanTALK

Neon Beach · 09-04-2004, 12:14 PM

Has anyone heard that these two things put together is a bad combination?

_________________

"I can't go to a bad movie by myself. What, am I gonna make sarcastic remarks to strangers?"
- Jerry Seinfeld, in "The Chinese Restaurant"[ This Message was edited by: Neon Beach on 2004-09-04 12:15 ]

lil_missfit · 09-04-2004, 12:49 PM

According to Raymond Anthony, aka Tanology. Yes is it a bad combination.

river_brat · 09-04-2004, 12:53 PM

why is it a bad combination. DHA is in a great deal of products. Please elaborate

Neon Beach · 09-04-2004, 12:58 PM

Actually this is what I'm trying to figure out. As lil_missfit pointed out there is a company that suggests it is, but it seems to be the first some of us have ever heard of it. I want someone to elaborate too.

lil_missfit · 09-04-2004, 01:26 PM

I tried to scan the brochure, but it creates to large a file and when I reduce it, the quality sucks. I will retype the information into Word so that I can email it to you. It is very informational.

engfant · 09-04-2004, 01:38 PM

MY problem is the very idea of using a NEGATIVE spin on something that has no backing to it (that I can find). At least they should have some sort of write up on this.

So NOW we have Anti UV Spray Tan ads and ANTI DHA UV TANNING ads.

DO YOU PEOPLE SEE WHY I F'N LOSE IT ON HERE?!?!?!?!
UV IS BAD. DHA IS BAD.
How about ANY COMPANY WHOSE MARKETING BASHES ONE PART OF THE INDUSTRY TO BENEFIT ITSELF FINANCIALLY SHOULD BE TOLD TO GO F THEMSELVES NOT SOLD A BANNER.

You people should be ASHAMED of yourselves.

If this is true why is RA the only to mention this? Don't say it's cause they care. They don't even offer 100% mark up on their lotions.

This board is making me BORED with it's PATHETIC attempt to generate revenue by ANY MEANS POSSIBLE.

river_brat · 09-04-2004, 01:51 PM

engfant....exactly why i am awaiting some kind of elaboation on this subject. I would like some other evidence other than just tanology.

Neon Beach · 09-04-2004, 01:55 PM

The Tanology thing is new to all of us today, we'll just have to sit tight and see if anyone can generate some answers. Hopefully this will come from the creaters of the statement.

engfant · 09-04-2004, 03:31 PM

SO far we are batting 0% in terms of distributors explaining themselves on here.

Neon Beach · 09-04-2004, 03:35 PM

That is true. Have you checked this thread?
http://www.tantalk.com/viewtopic.php?topic=2338191&forum=33

09-04-2004, 12:14 PM	#1 (permalink)
Neon Beach Join Date: Nov 30 2000 Location: Ontario Age: 61 Posts: 38,594 Rep Power: 107	Has anyone heard that these two things put together is a bad combination? _________________ "I can't go to a bad movie by myself. What, am I gonna make sarcastic remarks to strangers?" - Jerry Seinfeld, in "The Chinese Restaurant"[ This Message was edited by: Neon Beach on 2004-09-04 12:15 ]

09-04-2004, 12:49 PM	#2 (permalink)
lil_missfit Join Date: Sep 29 2003 Location: Arizona Posts: 1,374 Rep Power: 24	According to Raymond Anthony, aka Tanology. Yes is it a bad combination.

09-04-2004, 12:53 PM	#3 (permalink)
river_brat I love Derf!! Join Date: Apr 1 2004 Location: WEST COAST Age: 44 Posts: 906 Rep Power: 21	why is it a bad combination. DHA is in a great deal of products. Please elaborate

09-04-2004, 12:58 PM	#4 (permalink)
Neon Beach Join Date: Nov 30 2000 Location: Ontario Age: 61 Posts: 38,594 Rep Power: 107	Actually this is what I'm trying to figure out. As lil_missfit pointed out there is a company that suggests it is, but it seems to be the first some of us have ever heard of it. I want someone to elaborate too.

09-04-2004, 01:26 PM	#5 (permalink)
lil_missfit Join Date: Sep 29 2003 Location: Arizona Posts: 1,374 Rep Power: 24	I tried to scan the brochure, but it creates to large a file and when I reduce it, the quality sucks. I will retype the information into Word so that I can email it to you. It is very informational.

09-04-2004, 01:51 PM	#7 (permalink)
river_brat I love Derf!! Join Date: Apr 1 2004 Location: WEST COAST Age: 44 Posts: 906 Rep Power: 21	engfant....exactly why i am awaiting some kind of elaboation on this subject. I would like some other evidence other than just tanology.

09-04-2004, 01:55 PM	#8 (permalink)
Neon Beach Join Date: Nov 30 2000 Location: Ontario Age: 61 Posts: 38,594 Rep Power: 107	The Tanology thing is new to all of us today, we'll just have to sit tight and see if anyone can generate some answers. Hopefully this will come from the creaters of the statement.

09-04-2004, 03:31 PM	#9 (permalink)
engfant Join Date: May 20 2003 Posts: 9,301 Rep Power: 29	SO far we are batting 0% in terms of distributors explaining themselves on here.

09-04-2004, 03:35 PM	#10 (permalink)
Neon Beach Join Date: Nov 30 2000 Location: Ontario Age: 61 Posts: 38,594 Rep Power: 107	That is true. Have you checked this thread? http://www.tantalk.com/viewtopic.php?topic=2338191&forum=33

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)