Amendment 3 - Definition of a Manufacturer - IMPORTANT! - tanTALK

Don Smith · 02-10-2002, 06:36 PM

I have just posted "FDA Meeting Report (Part 5): "Definition of a Manufacturer" on www.naatso.org in the Regulatory section. I placed it on a "link" because the formating is so important in order to be able to read (and copy) it correctly.

As important as "annual limits" and "irradiance caps" and the "warning labels" are to us, this issue (Amendment 3 - Definition of a Manufacturer - as stated by FDA Friday afternoon) will be THE "watershed" topic over the next few months.

This issue will force everyone in the industry to decide whether or not they are for (or against) the best interests of tanning salon owners.

1. Will ITA support the rights of tanning salon owners on Amendment 3 - Definition of a Manufacturer or will they support the manufacturers that control the organization?

2. Will any of the four trade publications touch this "third rail" topic?

Please read (and copy) this material if you care about your business. [I guarantee that you will be glad you took the time to read it.]

We'll talk about it tonight!

Don

CHUNN · 02-11-2002, 08:50 AM

Don,

I looked for this for several minutes and could not find it. Could you please post it here or provide a complete link to the article. I really want to read this.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Manufactur's	tanu01	General Tanning Industry Discussions	17	12-14-2004 09:31 PM
Where the ITA is today!	Brenda at Eye Pro	Tanning Salon Management	39	05-24-2002 08:51 AM
Tell Don (and amendment 3)	solarmeter	Tanning Salon Management	9	04-22-2002 08:59 PM

02-10-2002, 06:36 PM	#1 (permalink)
Don Smith Join Date: Feb 25 2000 Location: Tucson, AZ Posts: 1,643 Rep Power: 26	I have just posted "FDA Meeting Report (Part 5): "Definition of a Manufacturer" on www.naatso.org in the Regulatory section. I placed it on a "link" because the formating is so important in order to be able to read (and copy) it correctly. As important as "annual limits" and "irradiance caps" and the "warning labels" are to us, this issue (Amendment 3 - Definition of a Manufacturer - as stated by FDA Friday afternoon) will be THE "watershed" topic over the next few months. This issue will force everyone in the industry to decide whether or not they are for (or against) the best interests of tanning salon owners. 1. Will ITA support the rights of tanning salon owners on Amendment 3 - Definition of a Manufacturer or will they support the manufacturers that control the organization? 2. Will any of the four trade publications touch this "third rail" topic? Please read (and copy) this material if you care about your business. [I guarantee that you will be glad you took the time to read it.] We'll talk about it tonight! Don

02-11-2002, 08:50 AM	#2 (permalink)
CHUNN Join Date: Oct 17 2000 Location: Huntsville, AL Posts: 3,819 Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 25	Don, I looked for this for several minutes and could not find it. Could you please post it here or provide a complete link to the article. I really want to read this.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)