Ergoline 650 or Dr. Muller Future Sun witch is a better tan

YucaTan · 11-05-2005, 12:42 PM

The Ergoline 650 or the Dr. Muller Future Sun? What bed gives a better tan? any advice

river_brat · 11-05-2005, 02:35 PM

I have a 650 and I love it. Clients speak the loudest and it is our most used bed.

bronzeman11 · 11-06-2005, 09:14 AM

The Ergo. 650 & the Future Sun are soooooooo close.

ramee · 11-08-2005, 10:40 AM

The UltraSun Turbo 25000 tans better. They are all good beds though. The UltraSun has 15-1500Watt lamps on top woth Mug 6 filter glass. On the bottom are XXL 200 Watt lamps.

You can run it at a normal voltage 220-230 and it still meters 115-130 mW/cm2

R

lindaobaseki · 11-09-2005, 10:06 PM

DEAR FRIEND,

MY NAME IS MRS LINDA OBASEKI AND I LIVE IN LONDON,I SAW SOME OF YOUR PRODUCTS AND I WOULD BE VERY MUCH INTEREST IN IT TO BUY, KINDILY SEND TO MY EMAIL BOXES:- lindaobaseki200@yahoo.com YOUR PRODUCTS AND HOW MUCH YOU SELL THEM.

HOPING TO HEAR FROM YOU SOON

YOUR FRIEND

MRS LINDA OBASEKI

TheMagicalTouch-UK · 11-10-2005, 01:46 AM

Quote:
On 2005-11-08 10:40:00, ramee wrote:
The UltraSun Turbo 25000 tans better. They are all good beds though. The UltraSun has 15-1500Watt lamps on top woth Mug 6 filter glass. On the bottom are XXL 200 Watt lamps.

You can run it at a normal voltage 220-230 and it still meters 115-130 mW/cm2

R

Actually, the Turbo Power 25000 has 160W tubes in the base NOT 200W and you have to have 3phase power for it as it won't run on normal electricity supply.

How do I know this??? Because I have one.

I really can't see how anyone can compare this bed to either an Ergo or a Futuresun (Dr Muller). It leaves them both standing in looks, performance, technical specification and tanning results.

kevbra · 11-21-2005, 05:57 PM

The 650 has 140 watt ballast on all the low pressure lamps both the ultra sun and the Dr muller have 160 watt ballast on the low pressure how ever the Hi pressure on the Ergo and the Muller put the Ultra sun to shame.Put the Dr Muller in and run it at 250v and it will smoke any bed on the market.

TheMagicalTouch-UK · 11-22-2005, 04:21 AM

Quote:
On 2005-11-21 17:57:00, kevbra wrote:
the Hi pressure on the Ergo and the Muller put the Ultra sun to shame.

Where did you get that information from???

Using just the canpoy lamps in this example....

Dr. Muller = Combined Watts 15,200
Ergo = Combined watts 6,000
UltraSun = Combined Watts 22,500

And the winner is...... UltraSun, by an amazing 7,300 watts and 16,500 watts respectively....

Now tell us again, that the Muller and the Ergo put the UltraSun to shame????

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
ETS vs Future Industry (Dr. Muller) vs Ergoling	tropxman	Open Forum	22	03-28-2005 06:54 PM
PRESS RELEASE: SUN ERGOLINE, INC.	solid	Open Forum	1	05-01-2003 08:51 AM

11-05-2005, 12:42 PM	#1 (permalink)
YucaTan Join Date: Sep 28 2005 Location: Michigan Posts: 64 Rep Power: 0	The Ergoline 650 or the Dr. Muller Future Sun? What bed gives a better tan? any advice

11-05-2005, 02:35 PM	#2 (permalink)
river_brat I love Derf!! Join Date: Apr 1 2004 Location: WEST COAST Age: 28 Posts: 1,572 Rep Power: 5	I have a 650 and I love it. Clients speak the loudest and it is our most used bed.

11-06-2005, 09:14 AM	#3 (permalink)
bronzeman11 Join Date: Oct 9 2004 Location: South Brunswick,N.J. Age: 49 Posts: 2,139 Rep Power: 36	The Ergo. 650 & the Future Sun are soooooooo close.

11-08-2005, 10:40 AM	#4 (permalink)
ramee Join Date: May 11 2002 Posts: 122 Rep Power: 0	The UltraSun Turbo 25000 tans better. They are all good beds though. The UltraSun has 15-1500Watt lamps on top woth Mug 6 filter glass. On the bottom are XXL 200 Watt lamps. You can run it at a normal voltage 220-230 and it still meters 115-130 mW/cm2 R

11-09-2005, 10:06 PM	#5 (permalink)
lindaobaseki Join Date: Nov 9 2005 Posts: 8 Rep Power: 0	DEAR FRIEND, MY NAME IS MRS LINDA OBASEKI AND I LIVE IN LONDON,I SAW SOME OF YOUR PRODUCTS AND I WOULD BE VERY MUCH INTEREST IN IT TO BUY, KINDILY SEND TO MY EMAIL BOXES:- lindaobaseki200@yahoo.com YOUR PRODUCTS AND HOW MUCH YOU SELL THEM. HOPING TO HEAR FROM YOU SOON YOUR FRIEND MRS LINDA OBASEKI

11-10-2005, 01:46 AM	#6 (permalink)
TheMagicalTouch-UK Join Date: Dec 17 2004 Location: Essex, UK Age: 33 Posts: 98 Rep Power: 0	Quote: On 2005-11-08 10:40:00, ramee wrote: The UltraSun Turbo 25000 tans better. They are all good beds though. The UltraSun has 15-1500Watt lamps on top woth Mug 6 filter glass. On the bottom are XXL 200 Watt lamps. You can run it at a normal voltage 220-230 and it still meters 115-130 mW/cm2 R Actually, the Turbo Power 25000 has 160W tubes in the base NOT 200W and you have to have 3phase power for it as it won't run on normal electricity supply. How do I know this??? Because I have one. I really can't see how anyone can compare this bed to either an Ergo or a Futuresun (Dr Muller). It leaves them both standing in looks, performance, technical specification and tanning results.

11-21-2005, 05:57 PM	#7 (permalink)
kevbra Join Date: Apr 20 2003 Location: GA Posts: 29 Rep Power: 0	The 650 has 140 watt ballast on all the low pressure lamps both the ultra sun and the Dr muller have 160 watt ballast on the low pressure how ever the Hi pressure on the Ergo and the Muller put the Ultra sun to shame.Put the Dr Muller in and run it at 250v and it will smoke any bed on the market.

11-22-2005, 04:21 AM	#8 (permalink)
TheMagicalTouch-UK Join Date: Dec 17 2004 Location: Essex, UK Age: 33 Posts: 98 Rep Power: 0	Quote: On 2005-11-21 17:57:00, kevbra wrote: the Hi pressure on the Ergo and the Muller put the Ultra sun to shame. Where did you get that information from??? Using just the canpoy lamps in this example.... Dr. Muller = Combined Watts 15,200 Ergo = Combined watts 6,000 UltraSun = Combined Watts 22,500 And the winner is...... UltraSun, by an amazing 7,300 watts and 16,500 watts respectively.... Now tell us again, that the Muller and the Ergo put the UltraSun to shame????

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)