vhr tt vs light source

qtan · 07-26-2003, 05:59 PM

how do u think the vhr tt compares with the lsi 2.6 160 w reflector and also the next one up i beleive its a 4.2

ellas14 · 07-26-2003, 06:42 PM

I have been using new technologies 160 3.2 and they kick butt.. Clients love them and cut the exposure time by 2 minutes in both of the beds...

engfant · 07-27-2003, 09:08 AM

You can't go wrong with the TTs (except for the price)

ultimatetan · 11-21-2003, 12:13 AM

I just re-lamped my Orbit beds with the new AUVL lamps from Future Industries. They are supposed to be the same quality as the original Dr. Muller lamps. I think they are all that and then some. My customers are loving them. They give the customers such quick results. They seem to have just enough UVB to show quick results but low enough in UVA to get that great brown color.

JOHN @ URI · 11-24-2003, 12:52 PM

The new AUVL lamps are made by Philips. The old VHP lamps were made by LightTech.

The LSI 2.6 Morning Sun is going to be much weaker-less UVA.

The LSI Signature Series is a good replacement for the VHR TT.

tanfixr · 12-15-2003, 08:55 PM

Most of my customers would agree that the Signature Series is not only a good replacement for the TT, but most of the salon owners I sell to like the Signature Series better.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Light Source - 100W Beach Sun Lamps	dhgranstrand	Equipment	8	04-30-2005 01:56 PM
Light Source SummerSun or Cosmolux ESP	TanHere	Equipment	2	04-09-2005 10:38 PM
How Long Do Your Light Source Midday Suns Last?	dhgranstrand	Equipment	7	03-29-2005 10:03 PM
Is light source being sued by other lamp manufacturers ??	Mori	Equipment	5	05-04-2002 08:44 AM

07-26-2003, 05:59 PM	#1 (permalink)
qtan Join Date: Feb 27 2003 Posts: 78 Rep Power: 0	how do u think the vhr tt compares with the lsi 2.6 160 w reflector and also the next one up i beleive its a 4.2

07-26-2003, 06:42 PM	#2 (permalink)
ellas14 Join Date: Aug 16 2001 Location: midwest Age: 35 Posts: 383 Rep Power: 8	I have been using new technologies 160 3.2 and they kick butt.. Clients love them and cut the exposure time by 2 minutes in both of the beds...

07-27-2003, 09:08 AM	#3 (permalink)
engfant FREE ENGFANTUCATION Join Date: May 20 2003 Posts: 8,724 Rep Power: 12	You can't go wrong with the TTs (except for the price)

11-21-2003, 12:13 AM	#4 (permalink)
ultimatetan Join Date: Jul 13 2001 Posts: 39 Rep Power: 0	I just re-lamped my Orbit beds with the new AUVL lamps from Future Industries. They are supposed to be the same quality as the original Dr. Muller lamps. I think they are all that and then some. My customers are loving them. They give the customers such quick results. They seem to have just enough UVB to show quick results but low enough in UVA to get that great brown color.

11-24-2003, 12:52 PM	#5 (permalink)
JOHN @ URI I love Derf!! Join Date: Dec 21 2001 Location: Cleveland, Ohio Posts: 1,284 Rep Power: 7	The new AUVL lamps are made by Philips. The old VHP lamps were made by LightTech. The LSI 2.6 Morning Sun is going to be much weaker-less UVA. The LSI Signature Series is a good replacement for the VHR TT.

12-15-2003, 08:55 PM	#6 (permalink)
tanfixr Join Date: Aug 12 2002 Location: Michigan Age: 44 Posts: 307 Rep Power: 7	Most of my customers would agree that the Signature Series is not only a good replacement for the TT, but most of the salon owners I sell to like the Signature Series better.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)