|
|
#1 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Feb 28 2001
Location: tennessee
Posts: 216
Rep Power: 8
![]() |
i am confused,tell me why my tanses 44 160watt no facial has an MTI of 8 minutes and my royal sun 44 160 with 6-500watt facials has an MTI of 12-15 depending of skin type,both beds use the same lamps and the same ballasts,there seems no logic behind these numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Feb 25 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,525
Rep Power: 10
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Corvette:Especially considering the fact that both of the sunbeds mentioned utilize the same lamps (Cosmedico VHR). Add to this confusion the fact that another manufacturer utilizing the VHR's (Megasun) claims a 20 minute MTI.I think you will find that all of these sunbeds will reach 4.0 MED in approximately 12-13 minutes. Therefore, the difference in the "claims" are, IMHO, marketing rather than science driven.Don
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|