View Single Post
Old 05-30-2001, 09:21 PM   #17 (permalink)
Brian Oshman
Brian Oshman
 
Join Date: Apr 29 2001
Location: High Bridge, NJ
Age: 39
Posts: 856
Rep Power: 12 Brian Oshman has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Oshman has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Oshman has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Oshman has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Oshman has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Oshman has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Oshman has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Oshman has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Oshman has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Oshman has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Oshman has a reputation beyond repute
I work for a major manufacturer and we do things by the book. These tests can be altered to achieve different results. When performing an irradiance test the incoming voltage plays a major part in the output of the lamp as also does the amount of capacitance utilized in the test specimen and amount of cooling (or lack of). These three variables create the most impact on the test results. Some bed manufacturers use these tactics to mislabel their equipment to create marketing hype. Once the test is filed any changes in the design need not be filed since the only thing the FDA cares about is that the replacement lamp complies with the original. So be aware. Lamp data from the lamp manufacturer is the most acurate way in determining if the equipment the lamp is installed in is providing proper warning label information.[This message has been edited by Brian Oshman (edited 05-30-2001).]
Brian Oshman is offline   Reply With Quote