tanTALK - View Single Post

Gene · 05-27-2001, 05:17 PM

Brian, YOU are incorrect. If I weren't a salon owner, I wouldn't believe it either. It SHOULD be the way you say but it isn't. I can read FDA 21 1040.20 as well as anyone. I sited a couple instances above. There are many more. How many do you need? Manufacturers cynically play with these variables to come up with the maximum session they desire. Happens all the time. Is it disturbing? You bet! I wish it weren't true but it is. That's why progressive salon owners are banding together to offer our input to the FDA so they can revise the measurement processes. Only then will salon owners get predictable, consistent and reasonable incremental exposures as well as maximum timers. Won't you join us?I will add the tanning lamp manufacturers to the list in my previous post.

05-27-2001, 05:17 PM	#9 (permalink)
Gene Waiting Confirmation Join Date: Dec 8 2000 Posts: 212 Rep Power: 0	Brian, YOU are incorrect. If I weren't a salon owner, I wouldn't believe it either. It SHOULD be the way you say but it isn't. I can read FDA 21 1040.20 as well as anyone. I sited a couple instances above. There are many more. How many do you need? Manufacturers cynically play with these variables to come up with the maximum session they desire. Happens all the time. Is it disturbing? You bet! I wish it weren't true but it is. That's why progressive salon owners are banding together to offer our input to the FDA so they can revise the measurement processes. Only then will salon owners get predictable, consistent and reasonable incremental exposures as well as maximum timers. Won't you join us?I will add the tanning lamp manufacturers to the list in my previous post.