View Single Post
Old 05-08-2008, 01:35 PM   #38 (permalink)
eileen
kiss me I'm Derf
 
eileen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 10 2005
Posts: 6,819
Rep Power: 17 eileen has a reputation beyond reputeeileen has a reputation beyond reputeeileen has a reputation beyond reputeeileen has a reputation beyond reputeeileen has a reputation beyond reputeeileen has a reputation beyond reputeeileen has a reputation beyond reputeeileen has a reputation beyond reputeeileen has a reputation beyond reputeeileen has a reputation beyond reputeeileen has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Dermatologists fume at tanning industry claims

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aceboogie View Post
UUMMM thank you for proving my point! lol

you just said that tanning units filter out the UVB (less than 1%). So if they filter out the UVB which produces the Vitamin D, then how do the new units emit Vitamin D?

yes they provide for a better tan, but what is the health benefit, if UVB is removed?

just because it's 1% doesn't mean it doesn't start the vitamin D process. our matrix is 1.92 % UVB and produces over 40,000 units of pre vitamin d3 in one session.
__________________
under-exposure to uv rays is as dangerous as over-exposure...This is "D" life! (eileen)
eileen is online now