Quote:
Originally Posted by sunsally
Power For You was UWE - not Ergoline.
Can't read through the other stuff posted other than to conclude that Renaissance and Engfant don't care for Ergoline. To each their own. There are MAJOR salon owners with SIZEABLE operations making the CHOICE to put this equipment in their salons.
But hey --what do they know? No clue, no eyes and just being duped and "******" into buying lamps from the manuf. Guess the way they got so successful was being this dumb and dumping money into someone else's pockets.
Carry on |
To me, YES, it is dumping unecessary dollars into someone elses pockets.... But I guess from their perspective it's a good idea. I think it just makes them look bad (IMO). It is all a SQUEEZE!!!!! WAKE UP EVERYONE!!!!...... This B.S. is totally not necessary..... HUGE STEP BACK.....
I also currently have an ERGOLINE Classic 650 and this bed tans like a mother.... Why would the best bed ever made by Ergoline be discontinued. Now what they should do is recreate the 650.... It does not chew through lamps at all, facials last for about a SOLID 350 hours as do the low pressure lamps.
Now as the equipment becomes newer and newer, we are constantly changing out lamps faster than ever. I can't be the only one that sees this. All this B.S. about overpowering lamps... using 160 watt lamps powered 200 watt ballsts. DESIGN THE EQUIPMENT TO SUIT THE APPLICATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!