tanTALK - View Single Post

nlabtec · 11-12-2007, 11:22 AM

43.3 on a Solarmeter 5.0? I hope to **** not. That's a disgrace for this kind of tanning bed.

I get that out of my Ovation.

Also, what kind of VOODOO are they dealing with to get longer hours out of LOW PRESSURE TUBE LAMPS? You can't keep turning up the ballast and get more life out of them like a HIGH PRESSURE lamp.

With the new EU regulations the power has to be lower. I guess you didnt read the post or something. I do not know the U.S. reading for I only metered the EU one. Plus that reading like I said also was with someone in it and when let me get around to right places to meter it. Plus the bed didnt even have 200watts light I thing they were more 160's or 180's.

I dont like Ergoline but there beds tanned me very well out at Solaria and I was very impressed with there beds.

11-12-2007, 11:22 AM	#23 (permalink)
nlabtec Join Date: Nov 30 2005 Location: Timonium Md Posts: 173 Rep Power: 0	Re: Any feedback on the Ergo Prestige 1100? 43.3 on a Solarmeter 5.0? I hope to **** not. That's a disgrace for this kind of tanning bed. I get that out of my Ovation. Also, what kind of VOODOO are they dealing with to get longer hours out of LOW PRESSURE TUBE LAMPS? You can't keep turning up the ballast and get more life out of them like a HIGH PRESSURE lamp. With the new EU regulations the power has to be lower. I guess you didnt read the post or something. I do not know the U.S. reading for I only metered the EU one. Plus that reading like I said also was with someone in it and when let me get around to right places to meter it. Plus the bed didnt even have 200watts light I thing they were more 160's or 180's. I dont like Ergoline but there beds tanned me very well out at Solaria and I was very impressed with there beds. __________________ Exclusive International