tanTALK - View Single Post

Gene · 02-04-2003, 09:46 PM

This has been a tangled affair for me. The check format I saw on an early version of V10 was, frankly, a mess: 3-on-a-page-personal check size format with completely misaligned banking numbers, some symbols actually rolling to the next line. presently, I use 3-on-a-page business size checks (the most common format) on V 9.4 for one salon and 4-on-a-page for the other (different banks). This is a monthly nightmare and it's all because of Helios' inattention and sloppiness in properly formatting the banking codes. If the software lines up banking numbers and symbols to the accepted banking industry standard, there would be no problems with ANY bank.

02-04-2003, 09:46 PM	#6 (permalink)
Gene Waiting Confirmation Join Date: Dec 8 2000 Posts: 212 Rep Power: 0	This has been a tangled affair for me. The check format I saw on an early version of V10 was, frankly, a mess: 3-on-a-page-personal check size format with completely misaligned banking numbers, some symbols actually rolling to the next line. presently, I use 3-on-a-page business size checks (the most common format) on V 9.4 for one salon and 4-on-a-page for the other (different banks). This is a monthly nightmare and it's all because of Helios' inattention and sloppiness in properly formatting the banking codes. If the software lines up banking numbers and symbols to the accepted banking industry standard, there would be no problems with ANY bank.