View Single Post
Old 05-10-2002, 10:02 PM   #7 (permalink)
Sheila in Minnesota
 
Sheila in Minnesota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 1,805
Rep Power: 7 Sheila in Minnesota is a jewel in the roughSheila in Minnesota is a jewel in the roughSheila in Minnesota is a jewel in the roughSheila in Minnesota is a jewel in the rough
From Dr Cyr:Thanks for your memo. I will take your suggestions back to our working group.

The distinction between "exposure" and "overexposure" might be hard to define. An "exposure" to one skin type might be an "overexposure" to another type. Aren't the words "may cause" sufficient? Use of "overexposure" might lead to many questions. Let me know your thoughts on these differences.



Certain drugs and foods are always sensitizers to UV. It's not a "temporary" situation that going to go away. What did you mean by "temporary"? I realize that if you stop taking these drugs, etc., the effect will go away. Do we need to say that, or is that understood?



Don has been very good at convincing me that some of our warning label was confusing, as in the word "eventually" , as "eventually causes cancer". We've eliminated that word. We also adopted "sensitivity to UV", which were Don's words. I believe the word "temporary" is a new addition, or I've missed it before.



We're open to your suggestions, although I'd like to have more details on the above items.

S



Sheila in Minnesota is offline   Reply With Quote